Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Did the turn of the century spell the end of music as we know it?

  1. #1

    Default Did the turn of the century spell the end of music as we know it?

    Digital downloads, Myspace, reality T.V. and lest we forget crazy frog. Steps forward?..or substantial blows to the head of any integrity that was left in the greatest art-form?

    In order to delineate just what happened over these dauntingly brisk 10 years we have to examine an epitome
    .
    " I still miss the days when a haircut was just a haircut. It was only your mates you had to face. Now there’s a whole industry centred around people analysing your ‘look’. I just cannot understand how anyone could get so worked up by… hair", these somewhat hypocritical words are uttered from the mouth of Arctic Monkeys lead man Alex Turner.

    You could not find a better example of an archetype of todays music (pending Chris Crocker tributing Britney on the X- factor and releasing the Christmas number 1 album) than the scruffy-headed Sheffieldians. Soon after delivering their first single, "Bet that you look on the dance floor", on the popular social-networking site MySpace they shot straight to number one in England and have never looked back.

    Despite how beneficial this seems, as does any get rich quick scheme, it does have major drawback for us mere listeners. The main problem is,since they previously had not gone through the system we are without a fully fledged polished "band"

    What is this system I talk about? Well this system can be seen as a filtration, a pura if you will. It separates the Kaiser Chiefs from the Kinks, the Blizzards from Buffalo Springfield. It toughens a band up and gives them time to recognize their own original sound. Experience that can only be avowed to groups who tour and beg and borrow their way to the door of a record company.

    The Arctic Monkeys, however, put a chink in this chain. By bye-passing this the monkeys opened the stuffed closet and the aspirants came flooding out. Armed only with nice haircuts, devilish good looks and catchy riffs. Due to this we are challenged to find a recent band with a genuine classic back catalogue. In lieu of this we have nice sounding but generic attempts by "alternative" groups to empty kids' pockets or temporarily satisfy music novice's appetites.

    These bands are as beneficial as the microwave oven. But where do those of us who revere slow roasted, acuminate music turn? Well, fortunately the powers that be can't take our ability to spread word nor hear it. What they can do, however, is stop signing hard working bands in favour of some handsome metros with a new style, fashion style that is rather than any musical contributions.

    From there on in it seems these bands don't even get time to work on their sound as they are forced to throw out their second album in order to pounce on the success of their first. Like laim, wobbly kneed geriatrics on a treadmill, once they get to move forward they are shot right back into the wall.

    It is in this lay person's opinion that it is time for a bit of regression before the entire charts are filled with pretty people singing from the same sheet. I implore people that if you have any love for music you should, nay, must seek out struggling bands and show them your support. Buy their c.d.s, don't download. Hell, even just enjoy some of their great live music in your local pup with a relaxing pint. Let this be the decade where we turn it around and we will all reap the benefits.

    ************************************************** *******

    Message Board - Home

  2. #2

    Default

    let's just say for a 16 year old kid from south jersey, even in higher level classes or what have you (and believe me, i'm not bragging), this isn't the easiest thing to comprehend. i understand the point of the article (to show the substantial decline of thought in the way we listen to music and television as well as WHAT we listen to and watch), but since i'm a bit of a fan of the Arctic Monkeys, i don't understand if you're for or against their music/ways, etc.

    regardless, nice post and hello!
    friends don't let friends get friends haircuts.


    it's just a choice right now, between fear... and love.

  3. #3

    Default

    Every new day is the end of things as we know it?

    Bengal
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Good old Rock n Roll will never die
    www.gutterdogs.ca

  4. #4

    Default

    I didn't read the article... I have better things to do, like trying to lick my nose or trying to touch my eyeballs with my eyebrows...

    The turn of the century did not spell the end of music as we know it... Definitely not in a literal sense because the turn of a century can't spell anything. It's inanimate and just a way to categorize time. Something like that can't comprehend or spell words...

    I don't think that the turn of the century spelled the end of music as we know it because we know music to have many different forms... Maybe the recording process changed, I don't know. I don't pay attention that type of thing. Alright, it's not worth formulating anymore ideas...

    Ouch, I just realized that this is in a member's journal but I figured that since he/she only has one post, that it's more of a copy-paste type of thing and that this article doesn't deserve to be appreciated with a well thought out response... (Maybe it deserves a run-on sentence...)

  5. #5
    Senior Member hexcake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Brighton, England.
    Posts
    291

    Default

    Anyone who thinks Myspace, reality TV and the crazy frog are a threat to music, obviously has a very narrow idea of what music is.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •